A quiet hypothesis that rings painfully true
Lindsey Mackereth, over on her Substack post When Crying Never Came, has written one of those rare pieces that doesn’t just describe a phenomenon—it names a wound you’ve carried your whole life but never knew how to language.
Her essay puts forward a hypothesis: that some neurocomplex adults (gifted, autistic, ADHD, highly sensitive, emotionally intense) were infants who froze instead of cried. Instead of wailing for comfort, their nervous systems collapsed into silence. The freeze response hid their unmet needs, leaving caregivers—often loving and well-meaning—unaware.
That silence became its own form of trauma. Not abuse in the conventional sense, but neglect by omission. Needs that were invisible went unmet. And the child, to survive, learned the fawn strategy: become hyper-compliant, people-pleasing, endlessly scanning for relational safety.
My own freeze-fawn childhood
This landed hard for me. I was that child.
My mother was sick and in and out of hospital. My father, in order to keep us afloat, worked two jobs—gone before I woke, home after I’d gone to bed, weekends swallowed by security shifts. No one in my household was malicious. They were just absent, out of necessity.
So I learned to freeze and fawn. I became the quiet, easy child. The one who asked for nothing. The one who anticipated everyone else’s moods, trying to smooth out the rough edges before conflict even began.
And that’s the script I carried into adulthood: the eternal people-pleaser, forever hungry for approval, forever terrified of being “too much.”
Only in the past few months have I begun to let that go. To stop begging for permission to exist. To realise my needs aren’t defects but data—signals of what it means to be human, alive, and connected.
Where Lindsey is absolutely right
Lindsey is right that this freeze-fawn adaptation is not a small quirk—it shapes the nervous system for decades. Adults who grew up this way live with chronic dysregulation, dissociation, shame, and exhaustion. We can appear articulate, competent, even gifted, while inside still running the survival script of the silenced infant: stay quiet, stay safe, don’t be a burden.
And she’s right that society rewards this. The compliant child becomes the high-achieving adult. We mistake trauma adaptations for virtues. Hyper-compliance is applauded as “reliability.” Self-erasure gets called “team spirit.” Chronic anxiety gets dressed up as “work ethic.”
Extending the hypothesis
Where I’d take Lindsey’s hypothesis further is here: freeze-fawn children don’t just become invisible in their families—they become invisible to themselves.
When you grow up without your cries being registered, you learn that your feelings don’t count. Over time, you stop even noticing them. What gets rewarded instead is the performance: the smile, the competence, the anticipation of others’ needs.
The tragedy is that this false self can look better than fine. It can look exceptional. Many of us were the “gifted” ones, the “responsible” ones, the ones adults praised. Meanwhile, the authentic self—the child who never cried—remains frozen beneath the surface.
Toward healing
Healing, as Lindsey writes, isn’t about asking “What’s wrong with me?” but “What had to be silenced in me to survive?”
For me, thawing has meant slowly dismantling that lifelong need for approval. Learning to sit with anger instead of swallowing it. Learning to voice a need without fearing abandonment. Learning that being “too much” was never the crime. Being unseen was.
And for anyone reading this who recognises themselves in Lindsey’s post: you were never too much. You were never broken. You were just unmet.
Leave a Reply